Some hockey cathedrals gone, not forgotten ☕ taken at PPG Paints Arena (Courtesy of Point Park University)

There's never been an NHL arena quite like the Forum in Montreal. -- AP

A lot of great NHL arenas will live forever.

In our memories, anyway.

The sad truth, though, is that while a few get repurposed -- The Forum in Montreal and Toronto's Maple Leaf Gardens come immediately to mind -- most end up on the wrong side of a wrecking ball, often entering the afterlife as a parking lot.

But great venues, like great players and great games, aren't easily forgotten.

Here are 10 favorite venues that no longer house an NHL club -- or, in most cases, exist at all -- but were in service during the 1983-84 season or later.

10. MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM (Buffalo)

Most distinctive features: The large sound baffles that dropped down from the arena ceiling, and the benches, not individual chairs, on which writers sat in the press box.

Negative quality: The building seemed old and tired rather than historic, the way most NHL arenas of similar vintage did.

On the list because: Friday night games there in mid-winter just felt like hockey. Plus, there had to be a 10th venue on the list.

9. WINNIPEG ARENA (Winnipeg)

Most distinctive feature: The portrait of Queen Elizabeth II that was large enough to cover roughly two city blocks.

Negative quality: Those weren't ice sculptures on the sidewalk outside the rink. They were pedestrians trying to hail a taxi.

On the list because: The crowds were as knowledgeable as any in the NHL and invariably appreciative of good plays, regardless of which team made them.

8. NORTHLANDS COLISEUM (Edmonton)

Most distinctive feature: For a lot of years, its ice was the best in the league. Especially when the Oilers, who thrived on speed and skill, also were the NHL's best.

Negative quality: If the press box had been any higher up, people working there would have had their movements monitored by air-traffic controllers.

On the list because: It was so much fun to watch the Oilers there during their dynasty days in the 1980s.

7. MAPLE LEAF GARDENS (Toronto)

Most distinctive feature: Although the building didn't have the same feel as some other Original Six venues, any arena with a large photo of Whipper Watson in a concourse can't be all bad.

Negative quality: The pervasive sense of frustration and comical ineptitude during the Harold Ballard era.

On the list because: All things considered, it was one of the NHL's iconic venues.

6. MET CENTER (Bloomington, Minn.)

Most distinctive feature: There was just something about those green, gold and white seats. And the very cool North Stars home sweaters.

Negative quality: Terrible location. Turns out it was built where the Mall of America was supposed to go.

On the list because: The guy who put this list together enjoyed going there, for no particular reason.

5. ST. LOUIS ARENA (St. Louis)

Most distinctive feature: You think the Civic Arena's design was special? This place made it look like a cardboard box.

Negative quality: If the building hadn't been demolished 20 years ago, there might still be people wandering around its labyrinth of corridors.

On the list because: When the organist would pound out the Budweiser theme or "When the Blues Go Marching In," the crowd reaction probably registered on seismographs in California.

4. LE COLISÉE  (Quebec)

Most distinctive feature: Everything about the place, from public-address announcements to advertising in the corridors, seemed exotic to an English-speaking visitor.

Negative quality: A chain saw might not have been enough to cut through the walls of cigarette smoke in the concourses between periods.

On the list because: L'expérience d'aller y était magnifique.

3. BOSTON GARDEN (Boston)

Most distinctive feature: The Garden was an intimate building in every sense, including its undersized ice surface.

Negative quality: Bruins center Ken Linseman wasn't the only Rat you could find there, and he might not even have been the biggest.

On the list because: If the press box had been just a few feet lower, players might have had to duck when they skated down the wing.

2. CHICAGO STADIUM (Chicago)

Most distinctive feature: There are game rooms with ceilings higher than the one in the Stadium, which explains why you could almost feel the crowd noise at times.

Negative quality: The locker rooms were located below ice level, so players had to walk up and down a flight of steps before and after each period.

On the list because: The place practically screamed Original Six hockey.

1. THE FORUM (Montreal)

Most distinctive feature: Everything. If you could walk into the arena without having the hair on your neck stand up, it was time to summon the medical examiner.

Negative quality: Structural beams obscured some views from the press box.

On the list because: There never has been -- and never will be -- anyplace like it.

Loading...
Loading...